C.E.R.N. and High-Energy Particle Physics Research:
A Risk to Destroy the Universe

Last Update: 9 January, 2023

What this Issue is About:

C.E.R.N., which is short for Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire ('European Council for Nuclear Research'), is a nuclear physics research organization, supported by 23 member states, which runs the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), being the largest particle accelerator (or machine for that matter) in the world`. It's a 27km ring of superconducting magnets. It's extremely expensive and high-tech.

The basic idea behind this type of research is to smash particles together with such force as to not only split them into pieces for study, but to re-create the conditions of creation of the universe (aka 'Big Bang') to study the fundamental nature of matter and matter creation.

This this is tearing the basic fabric of reality in order to study it, there are other very dangerous implications of things which could go wrong.

Background Article: 31 Aug, 2015: 10 mind-blowing facts about the C.E.R.N. Large Collider you need to know

Interviews and Documentaries on C.E.R.N.:

What's the Official Explanation on this Issue?

The official explanation is that C.E.R.N. and their Large Hadron Collider are only purposed to do fundamental research on the nature of particles, such as how the universe came into being.

Is the Official Explanation Satisfying?

No. Here's why:

  1. Being an international government project of the largest and most high-tech machine humans have ever built, and the most cutting-edge science, it doesn't get much press. It's as if we're wanted to pay for it, through our Governments, but not know much about it.

  2. Lack of Reasonably Sufficient Incentive to be a Priority: At a time when the world is screaming in various social, medical, environmental, and many other life-threatening needs, and wars, even shortages of food, it doesn't make sense that so many countries would band together to supply apparently unlimited funding and otherwise support fundamental particle research which has no clear expectation of applicable value when it's completed. Supposedly it's only to answer curiosities about how the universe began, while ignoring far more urgent curiosities like how to feed our people or how to stabilize our financial systems.

  3. Unjustified Eagerness for Power: Even if the world is interested to start this project, it doesn't explain their eagerness to keep re-funding it for more and more upgrades especially to make it more and more powerful. It seems that they spend more time upgrading than actually doing experiments. When is upgrading always more important than using? It's like they're very eager to achieve something, and for fundamental research, the expense isn't reasonable to upgrade so quickly to another level without getting the full use out of the level you're at. The eagerness for more and more power in a concernted international effort is one of the reasons C.E.R.N. has been compared to the Biblical account of the building fo the tower of Babel.

  4. Occult & Religious Symbolism: If this is a purely scientific effort, as it pretends to be, it doesn't explain the tremendous amount of occult and religious symbolism in its construction and promotion, including:

    1. Why are the particles called 'hadrons'? 'Had' stands for Hades, the pagan god of the underworld. The collider may actually be an attempt to reach Hell.

    2. C.E.R.N.'s links to the Biblical Number of the Beast:

      "Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six." (Holy Bible, KJV, Revelation 13:18)

      • The C.E.R.N. logo is a symbol of 666, ie. three 6s cojoined at their loop in a circular pattern:

      • C.E.R.N. building 32 is exactly 6.66 miles (as the crow files) distance from the World Economic Forum (according to Google Maps):

    3. A large (2m tall) statue of the pagan god Shiva at the door of the main entrance to C.E.R.N.. Conventional science does not mix with or promote religion, because the scientific method is an approach of finding truth without trust or faith or religion. There is a long history of science and religion being at odds with each other, as though cultural enemies. It is very strange to have any large statue outside the main C.E.R.N. building, especially one promoted with a plaque which reads, among other things, "for the modern physicists, then, Shiva's dance is the dance of subatomic matter", and, "physicists have used the most advanced technology to portray the patterns of the cosmic dance". This reduces the entire effort at C.E.R.N. to a religious pursuit, and it's suprising that scientists wouldn't object to that connotation, unless it really is some kind of spiritual or religious pursuit and they welcome this pagan god's help. In fact, this type of statue placed there with a plaque that says that suggests that this is actually a dedication of the project to the pagan god Shiva. Article including showing the plaque: Why is there a statue of Shiva at C.E.R.N.?

    4. An occult ritual of human sacrifice was filmed at the place of the Shiva statue in 2016, apparently by C.E.R.N. employees or visiting scientists, because access is controlled and they had C.E.R.N. ID badges. Real or fake, since when do scientists at work put on occult rituals?

    5. Build on the site of a Temple to the same pagan god mentioned in the Bible's Book of Revelation which the C.E.R.N. project is feared to relate to. The site of the LHC is partly based on the town Saint Genis Pouilly, in Roman times called Apollacum, thought to be an ancient temple to the pagan god Appollo. This name is a link to a Biblical Book of Revelation prophecy, as this article describes: UPDATE: C.E.R.N., Apollyon, Gateways, Book Of Revelation….

  5. All risks considered acceptable to pursue this goal. Even if fundamental research with no clear hope of engineering application is important enough to dedicate unlimited money to when so much of the world is hungry, why is it also considered so important to pursue this goal that the risks, which are dire, are considered ignorable or acceptable? For example:

    1. Opening a black hole: What If a Black Hole Opened at C.E.R.N.?. Actually there is more concern that C.E.R.N. could open up quantum black holes, which are hoped to instantly decay before they can absorb matter and grow bigger and more stable and powerful (if the hope is wrong then we all die). Mr. Otto Rossler, a German professor at the University of Tubingen, sued C.E.R.N. in 2008 over this danger. Here is a page from C.E.R.N.'s official website where they publicly admit that creation of black holes by their machine is possible but, as they put it, 'perfectly safe': https://angelsanddemons.web.cern.ch/faq/black-hole.html. An important point to remember about these reassurances is that we don't actually have experience with quantum black holes: only untested theories. Based on that, there's a whole lot of behaviour that could be different from what we expect.

    2. Destroying the entire universe: Stephen Hawking: God particle could wipe out the universe

    3. Exploding, at least according to astrophysicist Neil de Grasse Tyson, as he told Eugene Mirman on his Star Talk radio show: “Ask yourself: How much energy is keeping it together? Then you put more than that amount of energy into the object. It will explode.”

  6. China intends to build an even bigger one. Article 23 November 2018: Inside the plans for Chinese mega-collider that will dwarf the LHC. If this was only fundamental scientific research for explaining how matter came to be, and there were no secrets, why would China want to go to the extreme expense, and risk, of building their own? They should be more than happy that someone else is doing the research for them. After all, part of the official mission of C.E.R.N., from their own webpage, is to, "unite people from all over the world to push the frontiers of science and technology, for the benefit of all." Why rebuild a benefit you're getting for free from generous people?

Evidence of Another Explanation

C.E.R.N. may be a race to open a doorway to another dimension, especially Hell, to let demons out of that realm into this one.

The motive for this is to please demon masters.

This would explain the eager worldwide Government support (since the Shadow Government is satanic).

The theology of it is that the demons want to come here (to our harm), but although they know how, the Divine will won't allow them to do that to us. However, if through satanic witchcraft they teach the method to humans, and humans knowingly open the doorway, then they can come in.

Some supporting evidence for this theory:

  1. Reuters October 20, 2010: C.E.R.N. scientists eye parallel universe breakthrough

  2. C.E.R.N. 666 [They] Are Trying To Open The Literal Gates of Hell!, Symbolism Will Be Their Downfall!

  3. Sergio Bertolucci, former Director for Research and Scientific Computing of the facility, admitted that C.E.R.N. could an open interdimensional door, and something could go in or out: 'Something may come through' dimensional 'doors' at LHC (2-page article, see link to page 2 at bottom of it).

  4. Wall Street Journal April 4, 2016: C.E.R.N. Is Seeking Secrets of the Universe, or Maybe Opening the Portals of Hell

  5. The Express, an 25 Jan 2019: SUPERMASSIVE new Large Hadron Collider WILL open door to neighbouring universe

  6. Reuters October 20, 2010: C.E.R.N. scientists eye parallel universe breakthrough

Specific Prophecy related to C.E.R.N.:

C.E.R.N. seems strongly related to the Biblical prophecy the Book of Revelation (Chapter 9, versus 1-11, KJV):

[1] The fifth angel sounded his trumpet, and I saw a star that had fallen from the sky to the earth. The star was given the key to the shaft of the Abyss.
[2] When he opened the Abyss, smoke rose from it like the smoke from a gigantic furnace. The sun and sky were darkened by the smoke from the Abyss.
[3] And out of the smoke locusts came down on the earth and were given power like that of scorpions of the earth.
[4] They were told not to harm the grass of the earth or any plant or tree, but only those people who did not have the seal of God on their foreheads.
[5] They were not allowed to kill them but only to torture them for five months. And the agony they suffered was like that of the sting of a scorpion when it strikes.
[6] During those days people will seek death but will not find it; they will long to die, but death will elude them.
[7] The locusts looked like horses prepared for battle. On their heads they wore something like crowns of gold, and their faces resembled human faces.
[8] Their hair was like women’s hair, and their teeth were like lions’ teeth.
[9] They had breastplates like breastplates of iron, and the sound of their wings was like the thundering of many horses and chariots rushing into battle.
[10] They had tails with stingers, like scorpions, and in their tails they had power to torment people for five months.
[11] They had as king over them the angel of the Abyss, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon and in Greek is Apollyon (that is, Destroyer).

The prophecy is that a portal will be opened into this world for demonic forces to enter in physical form. However, unlike the Biblical prophecy, contemporary analysts believe that it's an important principle for humans to open the door, as a mistake we'd be resposible for, rather than God or demons. Therefore the demons seem to wait for humans to develop the technology sufficient to accomplish that, and that technology is apparently C.E.R.N.'s LHC.

Other prophetic references:

  1. Is C.E.R.N. about to Destroy the Earth 07042022

  2. C.E.R.N Dream 4/8/22@4:09am

  3. C.E.R.N. & the Devil's Meeting Dream & Portals, Doorways & Demons Dream

  4. July 2, 2022: Amanda Grace | Prophetic Words About U.S. Supreme Court & 16 Reasons to Be Concerned About C.E.R.N.

Others' Analysis on C.E.R.N.:

What the Threat is:

C.E.R.N. is a mad science experiment where if they achieve what they're actually trying to achieve, it will be disastrous for humanity and, unlike other forms of suicide, potentially the entire universe. Dangers are the following:

  1. Opening a portal to another dimension, through which beings of unknown intent and power from that dimension could enter this one. For example:

    • From C.E.R.N.'s own website, there is this page https://cds.cern.ch/record/1243052/files/PRESSCUT-V-2010-10856.txt, where it says:

      we're looking here at an imminent visit from a race of carnivorous dinosaur-men, the superhuman clone hive-legions of some evil genetic queen-empress, infinite polypantheons of dark nega-deities imprisoned for aeons and hungering to feast upon human souls, a parallel-history victorious Nazi globo-Reich or something of that type. We took the matter up with Dr Mike Lamont, a control-room boffin at the LHC. 'We're hoping to see supersymmetry and extra dimensions,' he confirmed. 'There's no maths in it,' added Lamont encouragingly, having assessed the intellectual level of the Reg news team with disconcerting percipience. Summarising, then, it appears that we might be in for some kind of invasion by spontaneously swelling and shrinking spherical or wheel-shaped creatures - something on the order of the huge rumbling stone ball from Indiana Jones - able to move in and out of our plane at will. Soon the cities of humanity will lie in smoking ruins, shattered by the Attack of the Teleporting Juggernaut-tyrants from the Nth Dimension. Dr Bertolucci later got in touch to confirm that yes indeed, there would be an 'open door', but that even with the power of the LHC at his disposal he would only be able to hold it open 'a very tiny lapse of time, 10-26 seconds, [but] during that infinitesimal amount of time we would be able to peer into this open door, either by getting something out of it or sending something into it.

    • In fiction, the movie Event Horizon (1997) is a story about use of interdimensional portal going wrong: in trying to teleport to another point in this universe, they actually teleported into Hell.

  2. Tearing of Earth's space-time continuum. The obervations we call Mandela Effect are likely the effects of this.

  3. Opening a portal to deliberately bring demonic beings into our dimension from other dimensions, as a service to demonic beings.

  4. It's so powerful, and such uncharted territory, so tearing at the fundamentals of reality, that we don't even know all the possibilities of what can happen.

Other Concerns:

What the Underlying Problem Is:

The underlying problem is a failure of society, in worship of science, to restrict scientific work within moral bounds, as well as a failure of society to realise that there is really no such thing as atheism: you either love God or the Devil.

Conclusion:

The C.E.R.N. projects are an example of mad science, where humans are clearly tampering with forces too dangerous for us to control, and the project should be restrained for that reason. Exactly like the story of Pandora's box, once we make an opening for somethings to come through, we have no way to put them back, and that's only one of the risks of this high-stakes high-powered project.

Updates:

What We Can Do About It:

Pray specifically and regularly for the end of this project. Vide: HOW TO STOP C.E.R.N.

Good News:

One good thing out of the European energy crisis may be the hibernation of C.E.R.N.. Article 28 Nov, 2022: C.E.R.N.’s Hadron Collider latest victim of energy crisis

Back to Homepage

Flag Counter