Deliberate Abortion:
An Unseen Holocaust

Lo, children are an heritage of the LORD: and the fruit of the womb is his reward. (Psalms 127:3)

Last Updated: 21 January, 2024

What the 'Abortion' Issue Is:

Deliberate (or 'elective') abortion (as opposed to involunary spontaneous abortion) is the deliberate end of a human pregnancy by destruction of the unborn child. It is not simply a separation of woman and child, even in situations where the child is old enough to be independently viable, but always includes the destruction of the child. Neither is the procedure directed at the woman's body but rather efforts are usually taken to minimize effects on her. In other words, if abortion could be done with zero effect on the woman's body, that would still be an abortion.

These procedures are typically carried out behind closed doors in establishments which are not clear, from the outside or their name, that they do abortions.

This issue isn't concerned with involuntary miscarriage.

This issue does include concern for the plight of babies born alive as an accidental result of the abortion procedure.

It's necessary we understand exactly what an abortion is, in terms of the procedure, without which an opinion on the topic is not grounded in reality. Here are some overview video resources:

There is a pro-choice side, whose pure purpose is no restrictions and maximum public support for abortion at any stage of pregnancy, and the pro-life side, whose pure purpose is to legally prevent abortion at any stage of pregnancy.

The difference in attitude, on the surface, seems to be whether the pre-born child is considered a 'human' or not.

As we will examine, by definition human pregnancy is of a human, and most people invested in the issue over a long time seem to understand that. Attempting to strip the human status from the child is only the cruel first step in permitting and supporting that child's slaughter.

Rather than this absurd debate about the humanity of the child, to a rational person, the real questions of the abortion issue are:

Does choice carry a responsibliity?
Is killing justified if the other party has no power, legal status, voice, representative, or political influence whatsoever?
Is killing justified if it's kept out of sight?
Is killing justified if it's done in an attempt to protect yourself from inconvenience?

It is a woman's right and responsibility to choose, within her mind, whether to continue or end her pregnancy. However it's voters' right to decide if we will allow that choice to be carried out legally, and if so, if we go even further to actively support it with funding and other protections (such as criminalizing protest of abortion).

It is also worth noting that abortion legality can create pressure on women in the other direction, to abort when they do not want to, simply because it is a legal (and often funded) option. In the extreme, Government can and has, for example in China, forced abortion on women under such political goals as polutation control (of ocurse, if it was illegal, they couldn't force it without making it legal first, since Government operates by law).

What the Scale of the Carnage Is:

We're talking about tens of millions of children killed each year by abortion (average 73 million worldwide per year from 2015-2019, according to the Guttmacher Institute).

In comparison, the diret death toll of soldiers & civilians in World War 2 is estimated at 60 million human lives. Considering that that war was on for approximately 6 years, we can say that the average annual direct death toll of World War 2 was 10 million human lives per year.

Abortion is more than seven times that annual death toll, and, unlike World War 2, it's being going on for decades and still going.

It's the greatest holocaust of human life we know of in history. Unlike historical examples, however, this problem is still ongoing.

What the Threat Is:

Abortion has terrible threats associated with it, because it is killing the most innocent and often in the brutal ways:

Death for the child which is the purpose of the procedure.
Direct Moral Guilt of the Participants, including: woman seeking the abortion, anyone who pressured her to have it, surgical physician, surgical nurse, and society which funds it.
Guild and Curse for the society which supports or perhaps even permits it. The Bible teaches that innocent blood curses the ground (region):

"So ye shall not pollute the land wherein ye are: for blood it defileth the land: and the land cannot be cleansed of the blood that is shed therein, but by the blood of him that shed it." (Holy Bible, KJV, Numbers 35:33)
Wrath of God.

The Bible reveals that human self-awareness (spirit) is in the child in the womb (our underline added for emphasis):

[9] But thou art he that took me out of the womb: thou didst make me hope when I was upon my mother's breasts.
[10] I was cast upon thee from the womb: thou art my God from my mother's belly.
(Holy Bible, KJV, Psalm 22:9-10)

According to the Bible, children belong to God first and foremost. You can reasonably expect Him to be angry about them being destroyed. Psalm 127 puts it perfectly:

[1] (A Song of degrees for Solomon.) Except the LORD build the house, they labour in vain that build it: except the LORD keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain.
[2] It is vain for you to rise up early, to sit up late, to eat the bread of sorrows: for so he giveth his beloved sleep.
[3] Lo, children are an heritage of the LORD: and the fruit of the womb is his reward.
[4] As arrows are in the hand of a mighty man; so are children of the youth.
[5] Happy is the man that hath his quiver full of them: they shall not be ashamed, but they shall speak with the enemies in the gate.
(Holy Bible, KJV, Psalms Chapter 127)

In other words, don't expect God to defend your city or house anymore if you kill His children.

Even more seriously, it's the most dangerous thing you can do to anger your Creator. As the Bible puts it: It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God. (Holy Bible, KJV, Hebrews 10:31)

Risk of physical harm for the woman, including such as: death (such as by fatal bleeding), uteral perforation requiring emergency surgery, infertility.
Risk of emotional harm for the woman. Killing your own child doesn't serve the maternal instinct too well and one day you may regret your abortion, even in this life, without anyone saying anything to you.
Retribution from the spirit of the child you kill. Probably the least discussed consequence, but there are reports of this happening in Hell if the child chooses to hate you enough.
Gradual Erosion to Collapse of All Human Rights in any society which supports elective abortion. Here's why:

Humans don't really have any human rights if you don't have the right to be born.
The more you condone other humans to be stripped of rights, the more you legally and spriritually cause your own rights to be stripped.
Politicians who don't care about innocent children probably aren't going to care about you, either, such as your right to life, deciding your own medical treatments, or property. It's an extremely dangerous people to appoint clearly immoral people to rule you, and one clear way to see it is their positoin on abortion.

Parts to the Problem:

Social Problems

Our society strongly encourages promiscuity, without much thought on pregnancy, as if the two are detached. Abstinence is considered almost unthinkable in such a culture. This puts treemendous social pressure on people to have sex without much thought of risks.
The Education System thrusts young people into sexual peak beforee their intended profession begins. It prepares children with only a basic general education by adulthood (from high school), after which the vocational training they need for the craeer of their choice is years afterwards (in college or university). The rank wasting of time in gradeschool, learning very little for the time paid by Government, and then suddenly thrust into high intensity high cost study for years more for intended employabiltiy, means that, under such an inconsiderate system, by the time young people reach young adulthood, when their sexual desires are strongest, they need years more of education and of the most demanding kind for time and money. The tendency is for these young people to have sex, and get pregnant, and then realize that the education demands for their chosen profession are so greaat to complete, that they feel they must choose between their intended profession or raising that baby: an extremely difficult choice which doesn't need to be. It is a betrayal of young people for Government education to not prepare them in the vocation of their choice by the time of adulthood. Rather it prepares them for a crisis.
Supporting your baby is considered your problem alone, which at a glance seems fair, but a deeper look reveals is not. If you bring up that child, other parties are st up to make demands on that child for their benefit. For example, the Government will likely want to tax their income from the first day they work; Government also reserves an entitlement to conscript that child to fight their wars at any time. Similarly, community and family may be making demands on that child for help in the long-term future. Yet despite all these entitlements, these parties tend to leave the woman alone to bear the burden and choice to raise the child.
Our society has adopted a Culture of Death mentality, with a strong tendency to see children, at least other peoples' children, as a curse on the environment. In such a solution, abortion is considered a great solution. Our self-hate as a speciies is what blocks us from coming together as a species to celebrate and support pregnancies and children no matter who the parents are.
Women are often under pressure to abort from close relations who exploit the legality and public acceptance of abortion to demand the woman does it: as though keepign the baby is the selfish or rebellious choice somehow. This adds extra pressure of facing abuse or relationship loss if keeping the child.
Typically no help from Government or Community to quickly easily and early find a partner compatibile for you. However they do track your relationships for their own purposes, such as COVID-19 contact traces, just not for your purposes. Elecive abortion is not just about an unwanted child, but can often be about an unwanted or non-existent relationship. Having high hormones but knowing you haven't met that long-term someone pressures a decisions towards sex with a non-ideal person and then, if there is pregnancy, towards abortion. Put another way, if the other parent of that child is someone you know you want to be with for the rest of your life, it makes it far easier to keep that child.

Chemical Abortion
Surgical Abortion

Dilation & Evacutation (D&E) which is basically fatal dismemberment.
Partial Birth Abortion which exploits the legal failure to recognize a child as a baby until fully out of the womb, by killing even a full-term child just before fully leaving the womb.

Key Deceptions in the Abortion Issue:

The pro-abortion position hinges on key deceptions without which compassionate people could not be expected to accept abortion. They include:

The lie that pre-born children are somehow not human. This makes no biological sense and only depends on world magic to achieve the deception. If you're pregnant, you're not pregant with an organism of unknown species. The organism is human. Even the world 'child', by dictionary definition, includes pre-born humans. Use of the word 'fetus', which is an animal term, to apply to humans, without at least the word 'human' in front of it, mentally leads us to miscategorize the human fetus as any animal fetus and therefore attach no human rights.
That abortion isn't homicide, but mererely 'terminating' (not killing) a 'fetus' (not human being), or even 'clump of cells'. Not only is it homicide (killing a human), and not only is that an innocent human, but it is the worse kind of homicide because, unlike killing an innocent stranger, it is a betrayal of the Life Giver's trust of that child to the care of that woman (and don't think He doesn't notice or have 'choices' concerning you).
The deception that choices don't have consequences. Both the choice to have sex and the choice for an abortion have serious consequences and many levels. It's not like choosing which flavour of soda you want.
The deception that womens' only choice in their reproduction is by abortion. No, they have a choice in having sex or not. Once pregnant, they can also put the child up for adoption if they don't want him or her. There is actually a tremendous shortage of babies to adopt, probably because many medical issues can lead to infertility in either parent. If Government cared about life they would make more of an effort to steer women with unwanted pregnancies in this direction.
The deception that abortion is harmless. It is designed to be fatal to the pre-born child, and as for the woman, it is an extremely anti-natural intervention which works agianst what the woman's body is trying to do. The art of abortion is trying to kill the child without killing the mother, and it doesn't always work out that way. A woman submitting her body for surgery doesn't have guarantees in how that surgery will turn out. Chemical (pill) abortions also have serious risks. It's like playing russian roulette with your body. Example articles:

The false impression that no women regret having an abortion. Many women who have had abortions regret it, and to ignore them is degrading to women and cruel. Some of their stories can be read at Silent No More Awareness; an example news article is Study finds 6 in 10 women who had chemical abortions wanted help or emotional support after. The false impression has been maintained simply by mainstream media typically not publishing such stories, as though every outcome is a happy one.
The notion that abortion is somehow a right women naturally and always had. No, it goes directly against the natural process of pregnancy to artificially end it. It is an extremely artificial intervention.
The notion that the foundational US supreme court case which opened abortion access, Roe versus Wade, was a fair decision. The decision has been overturned by the supreme court on 24 June 2022. As for the case, Roe lied about being raped, which was a critical factor.
The deception that abortion is healthcare. No, it is killing of a human being done in secret for payment, in other words, assassination.
The idea that abortion services are only offered for the loving care of women in crisis for its own sake. Actually there is a considerable profit incentive. Example article September 15, 2022: Abortion giant Planned Parenthood grosses $1.7 billion from murdering over 383,000 unborn babies
The idea that chemical abortions cannot be reversed. They can be undone if the antidote is administered early enough. Article: Canadian women who have begun a chemical abortion can now reverse course and choose life; you can also go straight to the Canadian Abortion Pill Reversal website.
The deception that an abortion will end the issue. No, as with all irreversible decisions, the issue is eternal.

How Deliberate Abortion Legality (and often public support) has Persisted:

It's a combination of factors:

Portrayal of complete prohibition on abortion at any stage as an unreasonable demand. Somehow the pre-born have been portrayed as 'them' and extraneous and a People we should be willing to kill or allow being killed, as though refusing to cooperate with that is just being stubborn. Example article: Trump: We're Going To Have To Compromise On Some Number Of Weeks For Abortion, "We'll End Up With Peace".

The correct moral attitude is that the pre-born are not an external group but part of the human family: not 'them' but 'us'. Asking us to compromise on the lives of the pre-born should feel like someone telling you it's OK to seek security of your family but not for your daughter.

Political candidates vaguely posing as having pro-life views but actually doing little or nothing to mitigate abortion when in power. You shouldn't be voting for someone except for specific promises, preferably written into their campaign platform.
Voting for someone who cares less about life than someone who cares more about life, because the polls indicate that the truly pro-life candidate isn't going to win but the moderate one seems to have a chance to win. This is a perversion of your responsibilty as a voter, to try to control the overall outcome, instead of doing your duty to simply give your vote to the candidate and especially platform most worthy of it. It's also allowing the polls to bend your decisions.

Even if it's true that the better candidate won't win, they need your show of support to run again next time and the movement to grow. If no one votes for pro-life candidates, it will be assumed that taking that position is political suicide, and it won't likely be offered as an option again.
Voting on other priorities. It is difficult to think of any other priority you should put above abortion, and if your candidate doesn't care about innocent life, don't expect them to care about you when they are in power, either, and neither will you morally deserve benefits if you vote any kind of support for the shedding of innocent blood.
Not voting at all. If there is a pro-life candidate, and you don't vote, and abortion is already legal, unless you have a good excuse (eg. you were shot on the way to the polling station), you are definitely guilty of passive consent for the bloodshed of the unborn.
Religious institutions relatively quiet about it, especially in the West. They prefer to talk about looking at a woman with lust as a huge sin, but on abortion (or nuclear war for that matter) it's unusual for Western established religions to criticize much. Maybe their incentives from government are just too sweet.

It's not that way in the East, however. Example article 29 Dec, 2023: Abortion is murder – Russian Orthodox Church

Taking a strong (pro-choice) position on abortion without understanding what it actually is in practice. It's amazing how many people do this, as YouTube video interviews have exposed.
Reckless irresponsibilty for choice. Choice doesn't make right but makes responsibility. When arbitrary choice alone is used as the sole justification to kill, that shouldn't be accepted, not even for an animal.
Kept out of discussion as if it's ridiculous to talk about. Sometimes this is done by political party policy, sometimes it is the Majority not wanting the bother of the issue or the related killing of innocent vulnerable humans. Meanwhile these groups always find time to talk about professional sports, which by design can have no lasting impact on society.

Apr 21, 2011: Harper vows not to reopen abortion debate as prime minister
May 9, 2022:
Most Canadians Reluctant to Re-Open Debate on Abortion

Unusual Support for (Elective) Abortion:

Elective abortion has enjoyed very unusual levels of immoral and illogical protectionism, more characteristic of a religion than a medical procedure, such as:

As Not Murder in a fierce denial culture of the humanity of the developing pre-born child is human.

Such advocates typically refuse to use the word 'child' to refer to the pregnancy but the words 'zygote' or 'fetus' instead, without the adjective 'human' in front of it, as if the type of organism is unknown, even though they do use the adjective with pre-born life of (other) animals. Example article: Why do scientists acknowledge cricket embryos but reject the humanity of the unborn?

This is done to prevent any claim to human rights by or for the child, and, as the only human remaining in the process in that view, recognize only the woman as human, and therefore categorize any attack on abortion access as an attack on womens' rights. Since denial of the humanity is the victim is typically the first step in gaining popular and legal support for homicide, as was done to the Jews also under the Nazi regime, it's fair to say that claiming that protecting preborn children is an attack on womens' rights is exactly like saying that protecting Jews is an attack on Nazis' rights.
As Choice being touted as a right entirely separate from responsibilty for that choice, even to the point of abortion advocates simply publicly proclaiming that they love to kill babies: Young Demon Screaming We Love Killing Babies In Front Of White House. 'My body my choice' is a favourite pro-abortion slogan, partly based on igoring responsibility for chocie, and partly on denial of the preborn human child as anything but an unwanted part of the mother's body.
As a remedy for inflation: 19 Oct, 2022: US Democratic candidate pitches abortion as cure to high inflation
By Government:

Government and/or insurance funding for this elective medical procedure even when elective services are usually not covered, or where even some essential medical services aren't covered.

ABORTION WELFARE: Getting an abortion in California is now “free,” thanks to Gavin Newsom

Regional Governernment health insurance paying for abortion services obtained even outside their region, such as to circumvent weeks-of-gestation limits in the home region by having the abortion performed in another region. For example some Canadian provinces with low gestation limits do this.

Also subsidizing the the costs of patient transportation to and from the clinic
Government exemption of abortion procedures from pandemic restrictions even when most other medical procedures are restricted, as we saw in the COVID-19 pandemic.
Government financial support for some abortion clinics to remain profitable and stay open no matter how many abortions they perform even when other businesses are failing: Newfoundland taxpayers forced to prop up failing abortion mill .
Resisting any anti-abortion decision of the courts. For example, in response to the US Supreme Court deciding that abortion legislation must be at the state level not federal level:

November 12, 2022: Biden Administration Ensures Unaccompanied Minors’ Abortion Access Post Overturn of Roe v. Wade
Using a federal order to try to keep abortion legal nationwide. Article: Biden signs executive order promoting abortion on demand following Roe v. Wade overturn
Proposals that the Federal government offer abortion in tents in federal parks to ensure there is no interruption in access to abortion services, not even when abotion is illegal by local governments. Article June 28, 2022: Democrats demand “abortion tents” in national parks to mass murder American babies on federal land; Sen. “Pocahontas” Warren thinks federal butchery of Native Americans didn’t go far enough

Foreign world leaders, normally reluctant to criticize domestic affairs, not hesitate to criticize any loss of abortion rights or access.

25th June 2022: Biden, Boris Johnson, Trudeau condemn US court ruling on abortion
June 24, 2022U.S. Supreme Court ruling on abortion 'horrific,' says Canada's Justin Trudeau

Foreign world leaders expressing intent to amend national constitutions to protect abortion access to this and only this medical service, if they see it get more restricted in another country, even if there is no corresponding movement to restrict abortion in their country.

World Leaders vowing to promote abortion worldwide in ways not done for almost any other medical procedure (except maybe vaccinations).

June 24, 2022: Trudeau pledges to defend abortion rights around the world amid 'devastating setback'

Government Restrictions Targeting Peaceful Pro-Life Activism (but not pro-abortion information or activism):

Government stripping pro-life organizations of charitable tax status

Jun 27, 2022: Trudeau gov’t commits to ‘taking action’ against pro-life pregnancy centers in Canada

Considerable Government tolerance for pro-abortion clearly terrorist groups and violence

‘Jane’s Revenge’ declares ‘open season’ on pro-life groups, promises to escalate violence

Deliberately reduced inspections for compliance requirements to regional health/sanitation regulations, as exposed in the movie Gosnell: The Trial of America's Biggest Serial Killer (2018)
Usually no prosecution for allowing children accidentally born alive from the procedure to be allowed to die (such as by exposure)
No restriction on experimentation performed on these children after abortion: not even if they are alive; they are not considered to have the rights even of animals for political reasons.
Even PRAYING SILENTLY prosecuted as a criminal act: Article Dec 20, 2022: UK woman charged by police after praying silently outside abortion facility

by Corporations:

Corporations insisting to support abortion access despite this apparently being opposite to their profit and population incentives:

Sep. 03, 2022: Big companies like Disney encouraging abortions: 'Good for their bottom line'. Wouldn't we expect a child-focused entertainment company to promote having children?
August 22, 2022: TARGET will use profits from customers to fund baby murder across state lines
The ‘Moloch 20’: Firms who’ve vowed to help employees get abortions
Google announces plans to aid and abet criminals who search for illegal access to abortion
Report: Amazon Will Give Employees Up to $4,000 to Travel to Kill Their Unborn Baby
Clothing company Levi’s promises to help employees get out-of-state abortions
Disney to help pay for employee abortions, child ‘sex change’ operations: report
Pelosi: ‘Of course’ companies should pay employees to travel out of state for abortions

Corporate bankroll of employees who wish to protest in favour of abortion access: Patagonia offers to bail out employees ‘who peacefully protest’ for abortion

Promotion by Satanists:

An unusual silence of criticism for sex-selective abortions, even in political jurisdictions which are otherwise strong and vocal in protecting equal rights for males and females.
Exemption from requirements for legal children undergoing the medical procedure to have consent from their parents, even though the procedure has serious risks whether done pharmaceutically or surgically.
Exemption from any requirement for the biological father to be part of the decision (although his consent is required for adoption permission, it is not to destroy the child by abortion).
Government ignoring or even working directly against, as though to mock, pro-life protests:

On eve of Canada’s March for Life, Trudeau gov’t announces more funding for ‘abortion access’. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced increasing funding for abortion in Canada on the even of a national protest there in Ottawa. It shows not only aggressive pro-abortion promotion, but hints intent to mock the pro-life cause and protestors.

Out-of-place concerns that banning this medical service would hurt the economy (as if profitabiliy is how medical right or wrong should be decided). Banning abortion bad for economy – US Treasury chief
Legal and/or regulatory pressures on medical professionals to participate in access to this service, even if it is directly against their moral or religious beliefs, and even though that pressure isn't exerted for other medical services: Ontario's highest court rules doctors must give referrals for services they oppose. Ontario courts actually made it a legal requirement to require physicians to act against their moral conscience if the patient demands it. In response to a challenge from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, three judges of the Superior Court of Ontairo ruled unanimously to uphold the principle.
Media blackout of deaths and short and long-term harms directly resulting from abortion.

Questioning the Argument

The fundamenal flaw in the pro-choice/pro-abortion argument is a failure to give any specific biological and legal status to the preborn child. This movement insists that the pre-born child is not human, so that it cannot be afforded human rights protections. They use a word, 'fetus', to refer to it which, although a scientific term, unfairly denies the humanity of the child because it is an unnecessarily broad term: the word 'fetus' refers to any pre-born life within the Animal Kingdom (especially mammals). Whether a life is human or animal is a major difference in law, but they insist to refer to this life with an animal term to deny that. Still, their position would have at least been clear if they simply stood firm on their implication that the preborn child is (by their argument) animal life. Yet even after referring to it with a word which means animal life, they won't even allow it to be considered animal life, apparently because that would also trigger certain legal protections, however minimal, such as from torture and cruelty. Rather the movement draws attention away from the preborn child and attempts to portray the issue as entirely a matter of a woman controlling her own body, denying the existence and question of the other body inside her as much as they can, even though abortion is directed at the preborn child (to kill him or her) not directed at the woman's body (which is only affected as necessary to access the preborn child).

Stripped of any rights, the unborn have not only been killed, and not only by or at the request of their own mothers, but are often killed in horrific ways (such as dismemberment or chemical burning) which certainly would be illegal if performed on any animal.

What the Truth on this Issue Is:

Once a woman is pregnant, the child exists, but is hidden. This doesn't make killing the child moral.

What the Underlying Problem Is:

The underlying problem with unwanted pregnancy is a focus on sex as a means to pursue pleasure and/or love. When engaging in sex with this mindset, the person acts contrary to their biology, and of course a pregnancy is going to be unwanted.

What the Right Solution Is:

The solution to avoiding unwanted pregnancy is to keep focus of this act on reproduction. The biological truth is that sex is a process of reproduction using reproductive organs of the body. Pleasure must not be the purpose of sex. Sex should be for procreation only, and although you don't need to try to guarantee prengancy, it is a perversion to deliberately prevent it. Love should accompany it but sex is not love and there are many other ways to share love which don't require a reproductive act. Therefore pursuing sex for pleasure or love is a perversion of the fundamental purpose of the act and leads to harms including the inconvenience to your life of an unwanted prengancy. When you let go of sex as the main way to share pleasure or love, then you can embrace it as the reproductive act it is, and your sexual life comes into order.
The solution to being pregnant is to have the baby. Yes it might be an inconvenience on your life, and, in an extreme situation, you might not even see a way to support the child, but that can happen with a child of any age, or any other dependent, and we must not accept that as a reason to murder. As for the society around you, hopefully they mobilize to support you in this challenge as they hopefully would in any serious problem you find yourself in.

Criticism of the 'Pro-Choice' (Pro-Abortion) Movement:

The movement is false. The 'Pro-Choice' label is undeserved. The more you study it, the more you are sure to find that it is not interested in protecting freedom of choice for women, but only the choice to kill, and to enourage as much killing and as much participation of society in the killing as possible. Proofs are that:

The movement ignores the choice of women to have sex resulting in pregnancy. By portraying lack of access to abortion as lack of reproductive choice for women, it implies that pregnancy is something which happens to women involuntarily.
The movement does not speak up to defend women who are physically forced to abort against their will (such as in China in enforcement of their child limits)
The movement does not speak up to defend women who are coerced by any other means to have an abortion they don't want.
The movement did not speak up for medical freedom against mandatory vaccination policies.
The movement did not speak up against many miscarriages which followed COVID-19 vaccination, or that the vaccines were releasted to, even promoted specifically to, pregnant women, despite manufacturers reporting that they have no data on the risks to pregnant women.
The movement seems intent to involve society in the act of abortion as much as they can, including: voting consent for it to continue (by voting for an abortion-permissive poltical party), use of public funding, legal protections against protesters, and attempts to ensure that no professional can refuse to assist abortion access as part of their job.
The movement doesn't seem to encourage birthing babies at all.
The movement doesn't seem to acknowledge or take responsibility for the regrets many women have about abortion: for example as shown at the website Silent No More Awareness. Apparently if you have an abortion, and regret it, you are abandoned of support from this group.
The movement ignores that not all choices should be legal.
The movement ignores that all choices also carry a responsibility.
The movement seems to ignore the moral and spiritual implications of a choice to abort (please see our section on that in this article).
The movement ignores that if it's solely a woman's body and solely her choice, then solely she should bear the costs of it.

The pro-choice/abortion argument is also flawed in that it unfairly denies any authority of the biological father in this decision.

The pro-choice(abortion) arguement can't maintain its moral pretense in the face of certain simple questions, for which abortion access advocates tend to resort to mindless mantras rather than give a logical answer, and increasingly show their bloodlust and eagerness for violent forms of activism. For example:

The pro-choice movement also tends to support infanticide in the sense of demanding the right to kill (at least let die by exposure) any babies accidentally born alive in an abortion procedure. This is more proof that the pro-choice movement is more about killing than love of life. Examples:

Spiritual Implications

These are not obvious but far more lasting than the physical ones:

Elective abortion must be a great sin, and there are indications that God will not forgive the unrepentant slayers of the innocent. Since killing innocent strangers is a great sin; how much more the child entrusted to you by God? To ignore the seriousness of it just because the world has is foolish: you are responsible for your own choices.

And shed innocent blood, even the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan: and the land was polluted with blood.
(Holy Bible, KJV, Psalms 106:38)

And also for the innocent blood that he shed: for he filled Jerusalem with innocent blood; which the LORD would not pardon.
(Holy Bible, KJV, 2 Kings 24:4)

[3] Surely at the commandment of the LORD came this upon Judah, to remove them out of his sight, for the sins of Manasseh, according to all that he did;
[4] And also for the innocent blood that he shed: for he filled Jerusalem with innocent blood; which the LORD would not pardon.
(Holy Bible, KJV, 2 Kings 24:3 - 24:4)

Societies which support or even quietly permit this bloodshed are culpable in the guilt of this sin. The responsibility for innocent blood has overturned nations, and is mentioned in the Bible as such.
Voting for abortion-permissive political parties must be included in that guilt. Here is a boycott you can read, sign, and share regarding that problem.
Besides Afterlife consequences, there is a stunningly reliable spiritual cause-and-effect type of relationship between abortion and disasters in the society. Please examine:

Exorcism reveals abortion key to Mexican cartel killings. Please at least see from the 15 minute mark.

Anyone who defends these children, on the other hand, can expect to be blessed for it, such as rewards in this life and the next, including some protections from the heaviness and effects of the widespread spiritual curse meant for those who supported abortion.
If you abort your child or not, your child is not 'gone'. You can expect to meet your child on the other side. If the child was deliberately aborted by you, and you haven't repented, you have no reason to expect that meeting to be a happy one.
There is no reason to believe that aborted children go straight to Heaven. Heaven is a place of reward and it doesn't make sense that not being born merits a reward, nor does it make sense that demons or satanists would support abortion if it sent human souls straight to heaven. There are testimonies that aborted children tend are left in a kind of spiritual limbo, unless prayer is offered for them, such as a prayer for the baptism of the Unborn (provided further down this article: in the 'take action' section).
Those who repent of abortion can be spiritually saved, especially if they try to make reparations, such as by warning others.

Historical Developments:

Good (Anti-Abortion) Ones:

Jun 24, 2022:
US Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade in historic ruling

Bad (Pro-Abortion) Ones:

Question Yourself:

You might have wondered what you would have done to oppose the Jewish holocaust in Nazi Germany if you had been alive then.

That government-supported holocaust was another generation's moral crisis to deal with, and although the Germans failed to deal with it morally, the Allies succeeded.

What you are doing to end the government-supported holocaust of our time, of the unborn?

What about pregnancy centers?

Many have become too politically correct (not to mention atheist) to even say that abortion is wrong, and will refer for abortion. Some of them are good, but the way to find out is to ask the director if they will say that abortion is wrong. It's worth finding out that before you refer people there or donate money to them.

Quotes on Abortion and/or the Unborn:

“The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and conduct of this army” --George Washington, 1776
"Objects of the most stupendous magnitude and measure, in which the lives and liberties of millions yet unborn are intimately interested, are now before us. We are in the very midst of a revolution the most complete, unexpected and remarkable of any in the history of nations." -- John Adams, 1776
“The hairsplitting difference between formed and unformed makes no difference to us. Whoever deliberately commits abortion is subject to the penalty for homicide.” – Saint Basil, 1st century Greek bishop in Cappadocia, Asia Minor
“The difference between the way of life and the way of death is great. Therefore, do not murder a child by abortion or kill a newborn infant.” – The Didache, apostolic moral teachings compiled at the end of the first century A.D.
“The fetus, though enclosed in the womb of its mother, is already a human being and it is a monstrous crime to rob it of the life which it has not yet begun to enjoy. If it seems more horrible to kill a man in his own house than in a field, because a man’s house is his place of most secure refuge, it ought surely to be deemed more atrocious to destroy a fetus in the womb before it has come to light.” – John Calvin, French Theologian, Pastor, and Reformer
“There was a time when our enemies wore white hoods and drove old pickups. But today, they wear white lab coats and drive Jaguars. For our (black) community, the real weapon of mass destruction is the suction machine at the local Planned Parenthood.” – Dr. Johnny Hunter, Speaker, Educator and President of Global Life & Family Mission

“The abortion industry kills as many Black people every four days as the Klan killed in 150 years.” – John Piper, Theologian, Author, Pastor and Chancellor of Bethlehem College & Seminary
“The abortion industry kills as many Black people every four days as the Klan killed in 150 years.” – John Piper, Theologian, Author, Pastor and Chancellor of Bethlehem College & Seminary
“Use your imagination to see what abortion really is! Fight against the kind of social stupor that gripped Nazi Germany – the feeling that the problem is so huge and so horrendous and so out of our control that I just can’t be wrong to let it be. Use your imagination to see and feel what is really happening behind those sterile clinic doors. If you could see each little handiwork of God and what it looks like when it is being crushed or poisoned or starved, you would say, this can’t be happening. Civilized people do not do this! The children will not be saved and God’s work will not be reverenced without an act of sustained sympathetic imagination. Otherwise, it is out of sight out of mind – just like Auschwitz. It just couldn’t be happening and so we act as if it isn’t.” – John Piper, Theologian, Author, Pastor and Chancellor of Bethlehem College & Seminary

Take Action:

Pick a side: unfortunately abortion support has been so integrated into our society, even in how our public money is spent, that if you're silent on abortion you support it. If you don't actively pick a side, you're on the pro-abortion side by nature of the system you live in. Only by actively opposing abortion do you maintain your innocence.
Pray the Prayer for the Baptism of the Victims of Abortion so that the souls of the unborn can be welcomed into Heaven:

NB: The above prayer has Catholic leanings but removal of purpose-unnecessary Catholic elements for non-Catholic use is reasonable so long as Christian spritual fundamentals are preserved.

Sign a Pro-Life Petition:

Find a Pro-Life Physician unless you want a physician who is equally willing to destroy life as safe it:

Prolife Websites or Organizations:

Back to Homepage

Deliberate Abortion: An Unseen Holocaust